Davis-Thomas Elementary-Middle School
Local School Improvement Committee (LSIC)
Ad-Hoc Committee
Final Report -- February 28, 2008
|
Phase/Activity |
|
Expected Completion |
|
Research
and planning for computer upgrade |
Done |
|
|
Construction, re-wiring,
new tables and computers installed |
Done |
|
|
Survey teachers |
Done |
|
|
Compile survey results,
feed back to school community, share with LSIC and PTO |
Done |
|
|
Ad hoc group puts together
proposal for teacher training and purchase of computer peripherals and/or
software |
Done |
|
|
Teacher training held February 16 |
Done |
|
|
Additional teacher training
held |
Scheduled |
3/10/09 |
|
Parent night held February
3rd |
Done |
|
|
Evaluation--survey teachers
and students regarding their use of the lab |
Planned for March |
3/15/09 |
|
Collect information to use
in the next phase of expanding technology use at DTEMS |
Planned for March |
3/12/09 |
2. Key Questions
How has the grant made a difference in the
quality of services or their effectiveness?
·
The teachers attended a training in the lab on Odyssey. The training taught them to take this
software from a classroom-type use (all students starting at the same lesson)
to individual-based use, with modules programmed for students based on their
WestTest outcomes.
·
The students really like the lab,
with its new computers, vibrant paint, and new desks and chairs; they are
motivated to go into the lab and work.
·
The Intelliboard (“white board”) has
increased the effectiveness of the lab by broadening the teaching methods that
can be used there.
·
More parents know how to access
Edline, the school site that shows grades and assignments.
What impact did the grant have on the
population served?
·
The grant served the teachers—the
impact it had on them was to make the use of technology much more feasible
(prior to this the lab was not fully functional). It is now less time-consuming and easier to
use.
·
The students are using the lab for
research projects on a regular basis.
For instance, the reading teacher is collaborating with the 4th
grade teacher on a technology research project that results in the students
creating power point presentations.
·
Students from 3rd and 4th
grade are using the lab regularly, which is new. In fact, the survey the committee conducted
was with 5-8th grade teachers because the lower grades rarely used
the lab previously. This is a positive
outcome.
During the course of the project, did
anything happen that was different from what you expected?
·
The committee had very strong
support from the county schools; the Technology Coordinator committed
significant resources to leverage the grant and was supportive of this
collaborative effort of LSIC, PTO and teachers at the school.
·
It took much longer to complete the
project than anticipated, because the county has very limited capacity in the
way of tech-help and maintenance/facility staff. An outside contractor had to be engaged to do
something as simple as hanging a white board, and he was slow to respond
because of other demands on his time.
How will the lessons you learned change
your future thinking, performance or services?
·
To quote the school principal: “Many hands make light work”—this project was
accomplished with the help and commitment of county staff, school staff,
parents and community members. It is a
good model to carry forward to new improvement projects.
·
The project helped foster new
momentum and energy about new possibilities at the school by completing a
project that helped the school community feel that it could make a difference.
·
The research conducted at the very
beginning of the project was extremely valuable—the committee moved forward
with a thorough understanding of what was needed and what it would cost to
complete.
·
Now that the computer lab is working
so well, it is in high demand and the mobile lab (laptops on carts) is also
being used more often. This lab may have
to be upgraded to continue to meet all the technology needs of the school.
3. Financial
Report
Project Budget Revenue
|
Source |
Amount |
Actual |
Difference |
|
|
$13,242.00 |
$12,385 |
(857) |
|
LSIC/DTEMS |
2820.00 |
1,278.00 |
(1,542) |
|
PTO |
2750.00 |
2,400.00 |
(350) |
|
Tucker County Schools |
2672.00 |
3,807.00 |
1,135 |
|
Community Connects
Foundation |
5000.00 |
5,000.00 |
|
Project Expenses
|
Expense |
Amount |
Actual |
Difference |
|
|
$13,242.00 |
12,385 |
(857) |
|
Construction &
Furnishings & Paint |
$4,800.00 |
4,316.00 |
(484) |
|
Computer stations 6 planned |
$2,400.00 |
2,490.00 |
90 |
|
GPS receivers |
$1,872.00 |
1,872.00 |
0 |
|
Re-wire lab |
$1,420.00 |
1,518.00 |
98 |
|
Intelliboard (white board) |
$1,800.00 |
2,189.00 |
389 |
|
Professional Development (teacher
volunteer) |
750 |
0 |
(750) |
|
Parent Night (teacher and parent volunteers) |
200 |
0 |
(200) |
The “news
release” format will be provided at the celebration, so that it can include a
report on the second teacher training and the evaluation work as part of the
content.